Subject: | [Shop-talk] computer virus question |
---|---|
From: | scott.hall.personal at gmail.com (Scott) |
Date: | Thu, 08 Mar 2012 10:50:31 -0500 |
References: | <43A5BF4FC1A5442AB7A6628A84BA771C@john5043a2d406> <0d8501ccfce5$ac46c050$04d440f0$@lotusowners.com> <SNT127-W631199AA4CDFF81AB3DB19A570@phx.gbl> <CAMHhs6dWHWYT+2SyOhzXPXj6q962b0uq++KD5SmLiFFoSdPyZw@mail.gmail.com> <4F58C5CE.1050507@gmail.com> <CAJ8HLP84ZHfzkC_APOmFOaiUAcMx+BE30qtr5=J4h3YnxL4RPw@mail.gmail.com> |
Yeah, but that's hardly incendiary or a good way to start a flame war, is it? Although I would say that whether or not a Mac looks professional or not depends entirely on the profession. Some places they're still very much like holy water to vampires in an office environment. I.e., you can't 'work' on it (even if you could). You bring a Mac into my office, for example, and people are going to assume you've brought in your personal laptop to screw around with your iTunes issues. (Note: I still have an Apple IIe and an original Macintosh in a closet in my house.) On 3/8/2012 10:34 AM, Peter Murray wrote: > No fanboi here, just a geek who wanted a powerful laptop that could be > used for modern games and didn't look unprofessional in a business > environment. |
Previous by Date: | [Shop-talk] computer virus question, Wayne |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Shop-talk] Running power to the shop, Wayne |
Previous by Thread: | [Shop-talk] computer virus question, Wayne |
Next by Thread: | [Shop-talk] computer virus question, Ian McFetridge |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |