Subject: | [Shop-talk] 220V extension cord with breaker |
---|---|
From: | dmscheidt at gmail.com (David Scheidt) |
Date: | Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:26:42 -0400 |
References: | <361299374.281825.1301516459043.JavaMail.root@sz0129a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net> <1998817713.281864.1301516497416.JavaMail.root@sz0129a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net> <006a01cbef19$4e71c1d0$eb554570$@com> <2968A0FF9B6E7A4EB08A6B3FED65DBC67B16E5@bnaexg01.cci-ir.com> <0LIW004DPGKRHJ00@mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> <DF70E92AB78F438D82CECC0B3781A071@HP62011> <0LIW008H7MI2W5Q0@mta6.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> <14aa01cbefa5$7461cd40$0301a8c0@randall> <BANLkTikd95YWYtBVJJP3ZMcuVMKkn9jDVA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Jeff Scarbrough <fishplate at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Randall <TR3driver at ca.rr.com> wrote: >> Are there places where >> some law forces you to use only "approved" portable appliances? > > I suppose your insurance company will deny a claim if you burn your > house down due to a non-UL Listed device. UL approves devices that are against code. As an example, they have a rating for edison screw outlets. (A widget you screw into a light bulb socket to get a receptacle. ) -- David Scheidt dmscheidt at gmail.com |
Previous by Date: | Re: [Shop-talk] 220V extension cord with breaker, David Scheidt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Shop-talk] 220V extension cord with breaker, David Scheidt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Shop-talk] 220V extension cord with breaker, David Scheidt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Shop-talk] 220V extension cord with breaker, David Scheidt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |