Just a note to thank Randall and the rest of you frequent posters for
all your professional responses to these posts. I barely understand
most of the things you folks talk about but I wanted to thank you for
your advice.
Maybe someday, if I live long enough, I will understand some of what
you guys already forgot.
It's mostly Greek to me but I appreciate learning what you guys seem
to take for common knowledge.
This is a great list and I wanted to show some appreciation for the
knowledge that gets handed out for free.
Just a dumba$$ accountant and part time Sprite mechanic.
Can you tell anything more than simple auto wiring confuses me?
Phil Nase
Quakertown, PA
http://home.comcast.net/~philnasecpa/
On Feb 28, 2009, at 2:50 PM, Randall wrote:
>> (all with 40 watt bulbs)
>
> Regular start, rapid start or instant start?
>
>> Interesting results, I think.
>
> That is interesting. Thanks for the report.
>
>> I actually expected them to consume
>> more than the bulbs were rated assuming some inefficiency in
>> the ballast, and I expected the old magnetic ballast to
>> consume more than the solid state one.
>
> Me too. But it makes sense to me that old bulbs draw less current,
> so I'm
> still wondering how much power was actually making it to the bulbs.
> That
> seems to me to be the way they usually fail, apparently the bulbs
> lose gas
> and the current drops until the ballast can no longer hold a plasma
> through
> the tube. For bulbs with filaments, then the filament burns out
> from the
> ballast having to constantly restart the tube (hence the flicker of
> a dying
> fluorescent). Instant start bulbs just keep restarting until either
> the
> ballast dies (from the constant restarting) or the bulb finally
> won't light
> at all.
>
>> I always wondered what was happening power-wise when magnetic
>> ballasts were flickering upon startup -- they are using very
>> little power until they warm up and reach full-illumination.
>
> Depends on the bulb type, I think. Regular start bulbs (the ones
> with a
> separate starter to replace) should be drawing filament power; while
> I think
> the others would be drawing nothing at all.
>
>> Just to see if my Kill A Watt was reading low, I tested a new
>> 75 watt incandescent, and it showed 77 watts, so I think it
>> probably is close.
>
> Agreed. But it would be interesting to test a larger selection of new
> bulbs, to see how much variation there is. I doubt they worry much
> about
> getting it exact.
>
> Randall
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
Shop-talk mailing list
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shop-talk
http://www.team.net/archive
|