Hi, Spencer
Chevy used that combination (305 700R4) in quite a few of their pickups. I
believe the the 305 has a longer stroke than any of the other small
displacement engines you mentioned. A long stroke means more low RPM torque
which is what you want in a truck. Be very careful regarding your
cam/compression ratio/manifold combination. I would look at a matched set
(intake and cam) from Edelbrock. Your on the right track if you want
affordability....you can build a S/B Chevy cheaper than anything else.
Dean
95 K2500 6.5 TD
Lookin fer a 49-55 panel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Spencer" <wits_end@worldnet.att.net>
To: <oletrucks@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 8:44 PM
Subject: [oletrucks] Smaller of the small blocks
> Hi, All. I recently picked up a 305 for my '55 1st Series Chevy, then
began
> wondering if it was the engine I really wanted. I'm planning on running a
> 700R4 tranny and the stock 3:90 rear end and definitely don't want a 350
or
> larger engine.
>
> My question is a litttle off topic. What are the performance differences
> between the 283, 305, and 307 small blocks? And wasn't there a 302?
>
> I'm mostly wondering what makes one engine or another better for a mild
> buildup. I'm planning on a new cam, higher compression pistons, manifold,
> headers, etc. Nothing too high dollar.
>
> Thanks in advance, and thanks for all the other info I've learned from
this
> list.
>
> Harry
> 1955 1st Series Chevy
> Reno
> oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
|