oletrucks
[Top] [All Lists]

[oletrucks] 235 Lower End & Cam

To: oletrucks@autox.team.net
Subject: [oletrucks] 235 Lower End & Cam
From: Hudson29@aol.com
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 14:25:43 EDT
        This weekend Brian from the Orange County Beater's Club came up to my 
shop with his stunning '55 second 3600 and together we opened up the bottom 
end on my used 235. The visible exterior portions of the motor had shown 
ample evidence of a very low quality of work and I had hopes that perhaps the 
lower end would have been a professionally done "short block" and out tyro 
mechanic would not have worked his mayhem within.
        What we found inside has so far not been encouraging. First the pan 
had several missing bolts. The timing cover proved to have three missing 
screws, two of which we broken off in the block. It also has an ovaled hole 
here and there and is somewhat beat up, signs of a great struggle by somebody 
in the past.
        Our past mechanic had tried to reuse the lockplate designed to hold 
the two capscrews into the front main cap and the retaining corners had all 
broken off. They may well have been part of the mucho particulate debris 
laying throughout the interior of the crankcase chamber.
        I didn't inspect the entirety of the camshaft, but one portion, the 
fuel pump lobe, had a concave wear pattern and did not look promising.
        We removed the main bearing caps and had a look at the bearings using 
the green plasigage. The number 4 main looked reasonably good with .0025 
tapering to .001 at the rear of the bearing. The number 3 main insert looked 
a little battered, but still was within spec at .003. The forward thrust 
surface was just into the copper backing. The number two main looked even 
more battered, gauged at a little over .003 (but less that .004) and the 
insert showed some copper on it's sides. The front main was not inspected 
because a broken bolt from the timing cover prevented it's removal. The rods 
were not inspected due to an early call by the Boss to take her to dinner.
        What I have seen so far looks marginal at best. My every instinct 
says that this motor is worn and needs serious work. In this motor's favor, 
it was running well when removed and probably has some life left in it. I 
will have to take a look at the rods to see if they can break the decision 
one way or the other.
        Questions:

        1. Can the cam gear be removed and replaced without removing the cam?

        2. Is that concave wear pattern on the cam lobe mean this cam is not 
usable?

        3. Is there any necessary problem with the copper starting to show on 
the inserts if the clearance is still within spec?

Paul O'Neil, Hudson29@aol.com
1951 Chevrolet 3600 Pickup Project, See it at:
The Poor Man's Advanced Design Tech Tips Page
http://home.earthlink.net/~conntest47/
Fullerton, California USA
AEROMARK - Need Rubber Stamps or Signs? See:
http://hometown.aol.com/hudson29/myhomepage/index.html
oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>