miq@teleport.com wrote:
>
> MarkNoakes@aol.com says:
> >
> > This is definitely a serious change in the approach to "clunker" laws and
> > definitely something we can't ignore--either from the legal side or from the
> > technical "how much emissions our trucks put out" side. Notice that this is
> > much more insidious than the TX law that someone else put on the list
> > recently. Even though this new approach is starting in Oregon, expect it to
> > spread to other states.
>
> I've been giving this some thought, and came up with an idea. Please allow
> me some indulgence here. While I gladly administer the list and keep it
> running for purely selfless reasons, I'd like to think that having a part
> in organized 540 members world wide interested in these oletrucks entitles
> me to a perk from time to time. This is one of those times.
>
> I'd like to put up a draft letter to the list--others input is welcome, and
> then submit it to the legislation involved with this signed by all the
> members of the list (well their email addresses anyway). What I would do
> is send the list the letter to be sent with a disclaimer on it reading:
>
> "Your silent acceptance of this letter forwards the list
> administrator the right to add your email to the signers as a class
> agreement. If you do not wish to be a party to this stance, send
> a message to (miq@teleport.com) and I will remove your address from
> the list of signers when the letter is sent to the legislature."
>
> Obviously, the letter drafted and the list of signers would be available
> for other states fight in this issue.
>
> So I'd like to hear opinions on this. Am I stepping over the line here?
>
> --
> __
> Miq Millman miq@teleport.com
> Tualatin, OR
> oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
I'm all for it.
Gary Stutz
56 Panel
57 GMC Panel
oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
|