I personally feel that there probably is no more relevant and important
subject
than clunker laws to this list. I'm sure we can all agree we wouldn't want to be
told we can't drive our trucks. I think Miq's idea is a good one and support it
in
itself. I can not however support any idea that requires me to endorse anothers
political ideology to do so. Rob, I respectfully think your political comments
are
divisive and crossed a line here. I don't feel I should have to agree with your
lecture on political ideology or endorse a particular party to oppose clunker
laws.
Grant 50 3100
Rob, Margie, Nick & Andrea wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Mar 1999 22:56:52 -0600, you wrote:
>
> >this is not a political List. I don't waste your time with my political
> >leanings; DON'T waste mine!!!!!!
>
> Craig,
>
> As the founder of this list, I believe I have the right to say that anything
> that affects our hobby, be it political or not, is well within the group's
> purview, and as such, is appropriate - and has been from the start. I respect
> your right to your views, but the bottom line is that we as a hobby better
>wake
> up and smell the roses, otherwise we won't have a hobby much longer. And,
>while
> you obviously think that environmental maneuverings are apolitical, I beg to
> differ. While the clunker law may have a much broader political basis than
> other environmental issues, the fact of the matter is that most environmental
> issues are largely democratic issues. This one just happens to affect the
> pockets of many large corporations, and as such, they WILL endorse it.
>However,
> were it not for the other rabid environmentalist issues, this would not get
>the
> same level of attention and support at the legislative level...ie., you can't
> have your cake and eat it too. You either get all the environmental extremes,
> or none, and most of the environmental extremes are sponsored primarily and
> LOUDLY by democrats. THAT was my only point. I could care less if you are or
> are not a republican or a democrat, or of any other persuasion, but if you
>want
> this type of bill crushed, you have, IMHO, to start at the base of the issue,
> and that is environmental extremism - and that IS a democratic (not
>republican)
> agenda. You can't pick and choose your fights!
>
> Rob
> >
> >craig
> >caretaker of
> >stephanie's 50 3104 216 5-window deluxe
> >
> >
> >oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
>
> oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
|