>
> I've been giving this some thought, and came up with an idea. Please allow
> me some indulgence here. While I gladly administer the list and keep it
> running for purely selfless reasons, I'd like to think that having a part
> in organized 540 members world wide interested in these oletrucks entitles
> me to a perk from time to time. This is one of those times.
>
> I'd like to put up a draft letter to the list--others input is welcome, and
> then submit it to the legislation involved with this signed by all the
> members of the list (well their email addresses anyway). What I would do
> is send the list the letter to be sent with a disclaimer on it reading:
>
> "Your silent acceptance of this letter forwards the list
> administrator the right to add your email to the signers as a class
> agreement. If you do not wish to be a party to this stance, send
> a message to (miq@teleport.com) and I will remove your address from
> the list of signers when the letter is sent to the legislature."
>
> Obviously, the letter drafted and the list of signers would be available
> for other states fight in this issue.
>
> So I'd like to hear opinions on this. Am I stepping over the line here?
>
> --
> __
> Miq Millman miq@teleport.com
> Tualatin, OR
I may be Canadian, but if it happens in the US, you can be sure we won't
be far behind. I'd be happy to sign on for the fight as well. Our club
does a voluntery annual smog check on our street rods. Most of the cars
pass with no problems. We had a guy with a flathead F*rd with a Scott
blower ans singles 4-barrel go through the test. It was cleaner than the
current year cars! Just proves that old cars don't neccessarily equate
to polluting cars.
Alan Gingles
1948 Chevy "1314"
http://www.nucleus.com/~agingles
oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
|