Yes, I agree with you here, Tim.
Cheers,
Greg
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
-----Original Message-----
From: "Tim Thresh" <tsthresh@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 14:06:33
To: North Bay British Car Club<nobbc@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Nobbc] Update on Tech Session
Greg,
You are correct that the synchro's go first. If they need fixing then it is
a simple(?) matter to check (and likely replace) the layshaft at the same
time. This shaft runs in pretty simple bronze bushes. The shaft/lubrication
to those bushes is down the center and seems pretty puny.
If the only problem is down/up shift difficulty then suspect the synch
cones. If the box tends to jump out of 3rd when downshifting under
deceleration into a bend- think Coleman Valley Rd down to the coast- then I
think it is likely the selector rods and/or layshaft as well?
Hope this all helps Mark and others reading the thread. Once the box is out
of the vehicle it is a "whole lot of fun" to work on.
Tim
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Greg Tatarian" <gtwincams@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 7:34 PM
To: "North Bay British Car Club" <nobbc@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Nobbc] Update on Tech Session
> Tim,
>
> With respect, I would not look towards the layshaft or layshaft bearings
> as the first most likely cause for gear clashing. This is based on the
> noise commonly associated with worn layshaft bearings or layshaft, present
> either in one or two gears, or sometimes in all. Also, synchros will
> generally wear more rapidly than the layshaft or its bearings, unless the
> 'box was run low on oil.
>
> While I agree with your observation that a worn layshaft or bearings will
> cause gear misalignment, Mark did not cite those symptoms, only gear
> clashing between 2nd and 3rd. I'm not sure that an MGA 'box is immune to
> this in the first place; the Alfa gearbox is known for early wear on 2nd
> gear synchros and constant need of slow and stately shifting in order to
> save the synchros. My experience with MGB's is that they synchros never
> last that long anyway. It might simply be that Mark's 'box is not really
> defective, just a typical 50k mile MGA box that's getting a bit worn...
> hopefully Ron or someone else can weigh in on this.
>
> It is always possible that a change in gear oil can minimize clashing (I
> bought myself a few months by switching to Redline MTL before finally
> yanking and rebuilding the 'box in my Lotus). If the 'box does have
> problems, I'd still lean towards worn synchros first, but not discount the
> other possible causes I mentioned in my earlier email. I do agree with you
> that if the 'box is truly in need of synchros, it doesn't make sense to
> fix or replace only those parts, which are readily available and not that
> expensive. A full rebuild can be a painfully costly exercise for some
> gearboxes; my Alfa 'box bearings cost 4x more than those for the Lotus -
> not to mention the synchros and other parts! I can do a full rebuild on a
> Lotus/Ford 2000E box for a few hundred $ in parts, while the Alfa has me
> in for $1,000 and I'm not even done yet!I'm not a professional gearbox
> mechanic, but I've built 7 of them now, and have disassembled about 11,
> and I've found many symptoms to be pretty diagnostic.
>
> Feel free to correct me, Tim if your experience is more extensive than
> mine - I'm always trying to learn more about everything!
>
> Cheers,
> Greg
>
>
>
>
> Tim Thresh wrote:
>> Mark,
>>
>> Sounds as though you may have a worn layshaft /bearings. It could also be
>> the synchro cones. You have to strip the box to fix both matters so do
>> them all at once. At a certain point the wear will result in a
>> mis-alignment which will prove fatal (ie no engagement in any gear). Mine
>> stuck in neutral luckily but I am not sure that is guaranteed.
>>
>> Perhaps the group has a recommendation for a good tranny shop if you do
>> not wish to do it yourself or become a project day!
>>
>> Tim
>> 1958 MGA
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Mark Darley" <markdarley@mac.com>
>> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 6:07 PM
>> To: "North Bay British Car Club" <nobbc@autox.team.net>
>> Subject: Re: [Nobbc] Update on Tech Session
> _______________________________________________
> Nobbc mailing list
> Nobbc@autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/nobbc
_______________________________________________
Nobbc mailing list
Nobbc@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/nobbc
_______________________________________________
Nobbc mailing list
Nobbc@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/nobbc
|