--part1_b91e60b8.2462b469_boundary
--part1_b91e60b8.2462b469_boundary
Content-Disposition: inline
Return-Path: <>
Received: from rly-yc04.mx.aol.com (rly-yc04.mail.aol.com [172.18.149.36])
by air-yc04.mail.aol.com (v59.4) with SMTP; Wed, 05 May 1999 09:55:07
-0400
Received: from imo20.mx.aol.com (imo20.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.10])
by rly-yc04.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0)
with ESMTP id JAA15426 for <DGreimel@aol.com>;
Wed, 5 May 1999 09:55:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost)
by imo20.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0)
with internal id JAB09545;
Wed, 5 May 1999 09:55:05 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 09:55:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@aol.com>
Subject: Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: autoxteam.net: host not
found)
Message-Id: <199905051355.JAB09545@imo20.mx.aol.com>
To: DGreimel@aol.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
boundary="JAB09545.925912505/imo20.mx.aol.com"
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
--JAB09545.925912505/imo20.mx.aol.com
The original message was received at Wed, 5 May 1999 09:53:16 -0400 (EDT)
from root@localhost
*** ATTENTION ***
An e-mail you sent to an Internet destination could not be delivered.
The Internet address is listed in the section labeled:
"----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----".
The reason your e-mail could not be delivered is listed in the section labeled:
"----- Transcript of Session Follows -----".
The line beginning with "<<<" describes the specific reason your e-mail could
not be delivered. The next line contains a second error message which is a
general translation for other e-mail servers.
Please direct further questions regarding this message to the e-mail
administrator or Postmaster at that destination.
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<morgans@autoxteam.net>
----- Transcript of session follows -----
550 <morgans@autoxteam.net>... Host unknown (Name server: autoxteam.net: host
not found)
--------------------
Final-Recipient: RFC822; morgans@autoxteam.net
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.2
Remote-MTA: DNS; autoxteam.net
Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 09:55:05 -0400 (EDT)
--------------------
Received: from DGreimel@aol.com (14432)
by imo20.mx.aol.com (IMOv20) id eDXHa26068;
Wed, 5 May 1999 09:53:16 -0400 (EDT)
Return-path: DGreimel@aol.com
From: DGreimel@aol.com
Message-ID: <ce563afd.2461a74b@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 09:53:15 EDT
Subject: Re: Another Question Regarding Spark Plugs
To: nogera@prodigy.net, morgans@autox team.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 13
Hi Bob:
Having had considerable experience with Champion spark plug cleaners, perhaps
I can help. As I recall the price of plugs has not changed in 30 years, so
they would have been more expensive back when. The leaded fuels of old fouled
plugs pretty badly and the breaker point ignition systems could only muster
about 25KV. This led to replacement or cleaning of spark plugs with far
greater frequency than we now enjoy. My hopped up stovebolt 6 (in 1954) got
about 3k miles before the plugs started to missfire.
The object of the testing portion was to install the plug, connect the wire
and hold down the button which caused the plug to spark. Then slowly
increase the air pressure in the test chamber while watching the mirror to
see when the plug started to misfire. If memory serves, about 85 PSI was the
acceptable minimum.
It is much more diffcult to cause a spark under preasure than at atmospheric
and so a plug that fires out in the open may not fire at all when screwed
into an engine. I believe that the silica grit is still available from
Champion or JC Whitney but my glass bead blaster has long since replaced the
plug cleaner.
--JAB09545.925912505/imo20.mx.aol.com--
--part1_b91e60b8.2462b469_boundary--
|