To: | mgs@autox.team.net |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Mgs] MGC rear axle |
From: | WSpohn4@aol.com |
Date: | Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:18:25 EST |
In a message dated 11/14/2007 10:46:22 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, doddk@mossmotors.com writes: The C engine in stock form doesn't put out an incredible amount of torque because there is quite a bit of drag from the main bearings. I'd be careful how high a gear you go with. The cars had pretty good gearing out of the box for a good balance of acceleration and long distance cruising. The typical upgrade is to leave the gearing alone but to upgrade revving ability by improving head flow and then reducing flywheel mass. This improves responsiveness a lot and makes the car a lot more fun to drive. ____________________________________ Kelvin has it just right. The late gearing of 3.7 with a 0.82 OD is ideal - longer is a waste. The engines respond very well to a lighter flywheel and some head work. Bill _______________________________________________ Edit your replies Mgs@autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/mgs |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Mgs] MGC rear axle, Dodd, Kelvin |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Mgs] MGC, Eric Markley |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Mgs] MGC rear axle, Dodd, Kelvin |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Mgs] MGC rear axle, RampantNM |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |