To: | "Max Heim" <max_heim@sbcglobal.net>, |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Hi Torque Starter follow-up |
From: | "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk> |
Date: | Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:44:35 +0100 |
Not so much 'need', as 'benefit'. Even on a later car with pre-engaged starter as standard the benefits are easier starting especially under adverse conditions and less load on the battery, extending its life. Also much less likely to 'smoke' with extended cranking than a conventional starter PaulH. ----- Original Message ----- > I have to admit I'm one of those who questioned the need for a "high torque" > starter, though. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Groovy Car Carrier, TR6UO |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Groovy Car Carrier, Dan DiBiase |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Hi Torque Starter follow-up, Max Heim |
Next by Thread: | Groovy Car Carrier, Eric Erickson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |