mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Offset question

To: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
Subject: Re: Offset question
From: "james" <jhn3@uakron.edu>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 02:23:04 -0500
Kelvin,

you are correct.  I wrote it backwards when I sent that email.  when dist
from rim to hub face is larger then rim width/2 the offset is negative.  In
other words you are correct.  Sorry for any confusion I may have caused, I
think it was late and I'm sure I was sleep deprived.

James Nazarian
71 B tourer
71 BGT V8
85 Dodge Ram
----- Original Message -----
From: Dodd, Kelvin <doddk@mossmotors.com>
To: 'james' <jhn3@uakron.edu>
Sent: 26 February, 2003 3:48 PM
Subject: RE: Offset question


> Hey James.
>
>
> Positive v Negative offset.  I thought a wheel with positive offset stuck
> out of the wheel well more.  A negative offset stuck in more.  Your
> explanation suggests the opposite.
>
> Have I been wrong all these years, it wouldn't be the first time?
>
>
> Kelvin.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: james [mailto:jhn3@uakron.edu]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 12:29 AM
> > To: Patton Dickson; mgs@autox.team.net
> > Subject: Re: Offset question
> >
> >
> > Most wheels are listed in a mm offset rather than
> > backspacing, a 0 offset
> > being the wheel face that touches the brake being centered in
> > the middle of
> > the rim width, a positive offset being a wheel face closer to
> > the outside of
> > the wheel rim.  Generally, the offset for MGBs is in the
> > range of +22 to +28
> > depending on who you ask.  By some rough math yours have
> > about a +36 offset,
> > and this is probably too much, but some excess positive
> > offset can be made
> > up for with longer wheel studs and a quality spacer.

///  or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>