4% sounds like a great correlation to me. Based on my beam type, I don't
think the scale can resolve more accuracy than that.
Bob Donahue (Still stuck in the '50s)
Email - bobmgtd@insightbb.com
52 MGTD - NEMGTR #11470
71 MGB - NAMGBR #7-3336
----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry Colen" <lrcar@red4est.com>
To: <MGs@autox.team.net>; <hans@hi-flow.com>; <capthiland@aol.com>; "Larry
Colen" <lrc@red4est.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 7:35 PM
Subject: Drive report
> So my procedure was to set the click type torque wrench at 50 ft-lbs,
> mount it in a vice and to watch the reading on the beam type when the
> wrench clicked. Both torque wrenches when set at 50 clicked when the
> beam type read 48. I suspect that my half-assed calibration done late
> at night with the beam type in the vice, was simply erroneious, since
> this time both click types were not close to the beam types reading,
> but also off by the same amount (4%).
/// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
/// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive
|