mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Vacuum Advance Part

To: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>,
Subject: Re: Vacuum Advance Part
From: "Telewest \(PH\)" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 18:24:48 +0100
It's not so much that the *distributor* needs manifold or ported, but the
application.  A distributor will work with either, but give different
emissions results at idle.  Correct set-up for running can be achieved with
either, but a ported setup may fail emissions.   It is possible to run
without vacuum, but you will get poor cruising economy or pinking under
load.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
To: "'Zach Dorsch'" <herr_dorsch@yahoo.com>; "MG LIST" <mgs@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 4:19 PM
Subject: RE: Vacuum Advance Part


> Paul shows that distributor as needing a ported vacuum source, not the
> manifold only vacuum source available on your manifold/carb combination.
> So, you are going to have difficulties getting the engine into correct
tune
> even with a brand new vacuum unit.

///  or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>