| To: | mgs@autox.team.net | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: MGF mid-engine or not? / Stylish or not ? | 
| From: | Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net> | 
| Date: | Fri, 13 Sep 2002 13:39:54 -0500 | 
<<<snip>>> there isn't as much difference in the 50 years of 1950s- 2000s as there is 1910s-1960s, but there is still a lot of difference. <<<snip>>> In 1952, would you consider taking a 50 year old car on a cross country trip. In 2002? -- Blake with a 49 year old MG TD that has been on several cross country trips. /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive  | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: MGF mid-engine or not? / Stylish or not ?, Bullwinkle | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Rheostat and the burned wires, Max Heim | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: MGF mid-engine or not? / Stylish or not ?, Bullwinkle | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: MGF mid-engine or not? / Stylish or not ?, David Breneman | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |