To: | mgs@autox.team.net |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: MGF mid-engine or not? / Stylish or not ? |
From: | Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net> |
Date: | Fri, 13 Sep 2002 13:39:54 -0500 |
<<<snip>>> there isn't as much difference in the 50 years of 1950s- 2000s as there is 1910s-1960s, but there is still a lot of difference. <<<snip>>> In 1952, would you consider taking a 50 year old car on a cross country trip. In 2002? -- Blake with a 49 year old MG TD that has been on several cross country trips. /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: MGF mid-engine or not? / Stylish or not ?, Bullwinkle |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Rheostat and the burned wires, Max Heim |
Previous by Thread: | Re: MGF mid-engine or not? / Stylish or not ?, Bullwinkle |
Next by Thread: | Re: MGF mid-engine or not? / Stylish or not ?, David Breneman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |