mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: more power (but we have styling)

To: "Bob D." <bobmgtd@insightbb.com>
Subject: Re: more power (but we have styling)
From: Tab Julius <tab@penworks.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 21:21:32 -0400
I love the style of the MG, and I also love (but don't own) an e-type jag, 
and others, but I have to admit that for current cars on the road I think 
the new convertible from, I think, Audi, is got a very classic look.  I'm 
starting to see a shift back to more distinct looks.  Starting with the 
k-cars, and culminating in the taurus, autos have morphed into this totally 
generic look where no one can identify them.  It used to be that you could 
tell a car even by the headlights (Saab, BMW), by the shape (Volvo, VW), 
and so on - now everything (including the MGF!) looks the same.  Starting 
with the PT Cruiser, we seem to be shifting back to a more identifiable 
look.  Thank goodness!

- Tab
'78B BRG


At 08:43 PM 8/8/02, Bob D. wrote:
>IMHO, our classic MGs are among the most beautiful cars ever made by man.
>What MGs lack in power is more than made up with styling.

///  or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>