mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Diaphragm vs. Webbing

To: "Craig D. Niederst" <niederst@telerama.com>
Subject: Re: Diaphragm vs. Webbing
From: Bud Krueger <bkrueger@ici.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 22:15:19 -0500
Hi Craig,

     I haven't pulled the seats out yet (I just started using it again after the
rebuild).  They're '77 vintage seats, so they probably have the webbing.  The
previous owner stored the car in a barn (on a farm) for the winter.  Furry
critters swiped most of the seat innards.

Bud

"Craig D. Niederst" wrote:

> Bud,
> If you haven't looked yet, check to see what you have in there now. When I
> bought my interior kit, I was told MG used the diaphragms from '62-'69, and
> webbings from '70-'80. Well, in proper LBC fashion, my '71 w/ original seats
> and interior had diaphragms. The kit came with webbings (which looked flimsy
> BTW), and were difficult to fit and would have required me to drill a bunch
> of new holes in my frames. I sold the webbings awhile back, and was just
> getting ready to order some diaphragms to complete the job. I had also heard
> via this list diaphragms were the way to go. Looks like I will have to wait
> due to the backorder...
>
> Craig
> '71 B

///
///  mgs@autox.team.net mailing list
///  (If they are dupes, this trailer may also catch them.)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>