| To: | barneymg@ntsource.com, jello@ida.net, ValveCurtain@aol.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: The ideal advance curve (too long |
| From: | Gonaj@aol.com |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:48:12 EST |
In a message dated 1/29/01 12:51:09 AM Central Standard Time,
barneymg@ntsource.com writes:
<< It also splits the electrical load between two sets of points, so they may
last a little longer. >>
Hey Barney;
I'm pretty sure that you know better than thet if you take a moment to
rethink what you wrote.
George
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Of floods and gasoline., Dennis |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Of floods and gasoline., Neil Cotty |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: The ideal advance curve (too long, Barney Gaylord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: The ideal advance curve (too long, Barney Gaylord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |