mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Hagerty results good so far...

To: Ajhsys@aol.com
Subject: Re: Hagerty results good so far...
From: "Andrew B. Lundgren" <lundgren@byu.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 20:05:11 -0700
Yep,  but I think that the idea is insurance wise, once the car is 75% 
destroyed, there is no point.  It would work if we had $25000 cars, but 
with $5000, it doesn't seem to work right!

Ajhsys@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 12/13/00 11:31:03 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> lundgren@byu.net writes:
> 
> 
>     My agreed value is $5000.  The damage estimate was $3700.  That 
>     exceeded
>     75% of the value ($3500) which requires totaling.  (Something I was
>     unaware of.)
>     
>     << SNIP>>
>     
>     I spoke with them today.  They told me the high bid was $300 and asked
>     me if I wanted to keep it.  I told them yep.  They said I will have my
>     check for $4700.00 in a few weeks.  (She said the delay was because of
>     the holidays.)
> 
> 
> 
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> 
> So they are paying you $1000 MORE than the repair estimate?  I wonder how
> long they will stay in business!  This must be some sort of ridiculous 
> law.  
> We have a lot of ridiculous laws in this country.  
> 
> (And I have Haggerty ins.)
> 
> Allen Hefner
> SCCA Philly Region Rally Steward
> '77 Midget
> '92 Mitsubishi Expo LRV Sport

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>