| To: | JustBrits@aol.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Timing Chain Single/Double ? MGB |
| From: | Bud Krueger <bkrueger@ici.net> |
| Date: | Sun, 26 Nov 2000 21:09:48 -0500 |
Ed,
I was hoping that responders would give some logical reason for their
opinion. Is yours only that it was cheaper?
JustBrits@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 11/26/2000 1:23:57 PM Central Standard Time,
> bkrueger@ici.net writes:
>
> > The option of
> >
>
> Bud:
>
> IMVHO, double. See reply to Lawrie<G>!!
>
> Cheers.............
>
> Diplomat Ed
--
Bud Krueger
http://home.ici.net/~bkrueger/
52TD
77MGB
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: A New MG, Dan DiBiase |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: New MG with ZS Flooding Problem!!, KENNETH WARINGA |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Timing Chain Single/Double ? MGB, Thomas Pokrefke |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Timing Chain Single/Double ? MGB, Barney Gaylord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |