Additionally, I find that when I am replacing a hydraulic component and do
not want to bleed the system, I fill the reservoir and then cover it with a
piece of plastic held on by the cap. Very, very little fluid will drip out
of the line. Rather like your thumb on a straw. I'm not sure this would be
a good way to drive around, however.
Peter C.
----
At 12:41 PM 9/21/2000, Max Heim wrote:
>Hmmm... the diaphragm on my disc-brake 67 Plymouth has a huge inverted
>bubble built into it. When the pedal goes down it looks like it moves
>several cubic inches of fluid out of the cylinder, and the diaphragm
>bubble has to billow out to compensate. I don't think a flat rubber disc
>fitted beneath the less-than-3/4-inch-diameter cap of my single
>Lockheed-Girling master cylinder is going to be able to stretch to handle
>the displacement of even a few cc's of fluid. If this was a good idea I
>think it would have been done.
>
>BTW my 66 B was built long past the era of bobby-soxers... more like mods
>and rockers...
>
>Hlsinger@aol.com had this to say:
>
> >In a message dated 9/21/00 9:37:01 AM Central Daylight Time,
> >a77mgb@yahoo.com
> >writes:
>
> >> ...in a vented system. Vented brake systems went out
> >> with bobby socks. My '58 Willys had a vented brake
> >> system, so I unvented it. I think the rubber diaphram
> >> was invented in 1959.
>
> >This should be fairly easy to do by cutting a flexible rubber diaphram to
> >fit
> >under the caps on the brake and clutch masters. Worth the effort?? Cause
> >any other problems??
> >
> >Alex H.
> >71 Midget
> >Tulsa, OK
> >
>
>
>--
>
>Max Heim
>'66 MGB GHN3L76149
>If you're near Mountain View, CA,
>it's the red one with the silver bootlid.
|