mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Lever Shocks

To: mgs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Lever Shocks
From: WSpohn4@aol.com
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 23:59:47 EDT
In a message dated 2000-06-09 5:22:23 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
owner-mgs-digest@autox.team.net writes:

<< Obviously I am an advocate of lever shocks being in the cars for 
 which they are designed (I wouldn't add them to my Camry). I know that the 
 ability exists to overcome the shortcomings of these Armstrong shocks. >>

I am an unrepentant advocate of Armstrong shocks.
 They last several times as long as anything offered as original equipment in 
the 50s and 60s, and if kept topped up are very reliable.

Having said that, I agree that the original seals are Mickey Mouse. I had 
mine rebuilt for my race car with hard chromed shafts and double lip seals. 
Do it once properly and they last the life of the car.

And they are a hell of  a lot better than some of the front conversion kits 
that set the shock to one side, introducing a bending moment to the 
suspension that is quite unwelcome. There is a little more excuse for using 
tubes on the rear, but again, rebuilt properly and with competition valves, I 
have never had the inclination to replace the shocks on my race car (and 
believe me, if I thought there was any performance point to it, I'd do it in 
a flash).

Bill S.

PS - Good explanation, Kelvin.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>