mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Shocking comparison

To: "MG List" <mgs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Shocking comparison
From: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 20:41:17 -0700
Note to Norm:

> ...I was looking at
> the space, geometry & potential attachment points for a tube shock
> conversion.  I know that there are various conversion pieces for the upper
> attachments.  I'm not sure any are really necessary.  It seems that a shock
> with min/max of 6-1/5"/13" would work with just high-strength bolts of the
> appropriate size...

Don't do it! My kit has a very heavy (1/2" thick) bracket that bolts 
through BOTH rear mount holes. I would not trust the structure of the 
frame to take all the force through a single bolt, since the diameter is 
limited to that of the existing hole and the shock eye. The bolt would 
also need a spacer or shoulder to keep the shock body away from the frame 
-- if this was a separate piece like a stack of washers or a sleeve it 
would not effectively transfer lateral loads to the frame. I personally 
would be afraid a 3/8" grade 8 bolt would bend like a noodle in this 
application.

--

Max Heim
'66 MGB GHN3L76149
If you're near Mountain View, CA,
it's the red one with the silver bootlid.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>