Hi All.
If I had a RB B, I would simply drop it it CB ride height whilst keeping the
bumpers.
I've found that the combination of extra weight at each end *and* a higher c
of g made for appalling handling, especially in the wet. OTOH, the 'faired'
look of the RB is quite appealing.
Dave H.
Can I Telework for you? See what I do, at...
http://www.angelfire.com/biz4/davtel/index.html
Troubled by a phobia? Know someone who has one? Go to...
http://www.angelfire.com/de/ukphobias/index.html
----- Original Message -----
From: Dan DiBiase <d_dibiase@yahoo.com>
To: <mgs@autox.team.net>
Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2000 3:04 AM
Subject: Ideal MGB Redux...
> Okay, I knew when I typed the word 'consensus' that I
> was thinking wishfully...!
>
> Here are the results from my informal (and
> informational) poll -
>
> o 1962 - 1967 MGB's: 8-ish
> o 1968 - 1971: 3-ish
> o 1972 - 1974: 2-ish
>
> Most everyone (except those of us that own 'em!) was
> disdainful of and disrespectful toward the RBB cars -
> shame on you!! I had to send my '76 out to the garage
> while reading those replies, else he would probably
> refuse to take me to Clinton tomorrow!
>
> At any rate, thanks for all of your responses, I
> enjoyed 'em all. Gonna go look at the '69 Tourer
> tomorrow evening and see it it deserves to share
> garage space with my RBB!!!
>
> Night.
>
> =====
> Dan D
> Dayton, NJ
> 76 MGB Tourer - Brooklands Green
>
> __________________________________________________
> Send online invitations with Yahoo! Invites.
> http://invites.yahoo.com
|