I have to agree, the MGA is just plain beautifull. The door handles on the
coupe just look so nice. I don't really think of my MGB GT as beautifull,
I think of it more as very very cute. I think cuteness is better than
beauty so..
Geoff
This one time, at band camp, Ajhsys@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 5/26/00 3:15:07 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> kris.chronister@fuelna.com writes:
>
> << So now I will step up for flaming by giving our final area of disagreement.
> I consider the B (particularly the BGT) the worst looking car of any MG ever
> designed. MASSIVE aesthetic step down from the A. Appearance is bulbous,
> heavy, amazingly ponderous looking for such a small car... Not at all
> comparable with the TR6, which was a much better iteration of the
> rounder/streamlined look of that era. (And I'm an MG buff saying that!). I
> consider it the second-worst-looking LBCar on record -- after the TR7. Yeah,
> I see how many are out there lovingly kept and restored and realize I'm in a
> minority, but hey, free speech, ya' know. >>
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
> Hummm, I like the looks of the TR-7, but only the roadster. The
> coupe is no good. I also like the B, but not as much as the Midget.
> My favorite would have to be the MGA roadster. No question that it
> is one of the most pleasant looking cars ever made, along with the
> Jag XK-120.
>
> There are loads of opinions out there. No flames from me on this
> post. Just keep them all on the road. Now that guy who posted
> about the Plymouth Volare can just ...
>
> Allen Hefner
> SCCA Philly Region Rally Steward
> '77 Midget
> '92 Mitsubishi Expo LRV Sport
>
--
Geoffrey Gallaway || The only thing worse than infinite recursion is infinite
geoffeg@sloth.org || recursion.
D e v o r z h u n || -- Anonymous, I think
|