mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: (Max) Shroud Question

To: mgs@autox.team.net (MG List)
Subject: Re: (Max) Shroud Question
From: bburrows@webtv.net (Bruce Burrows)
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 17:22:26 -0400 (EDT)
--WebTV-Mail-5336-9215

I agree with your analysis (see below) here, Max.

But this is what I do not know:

Setting aside and subordinating all considerations of the need for
cockpit comfort (either heat or cold), what is the preferred coolant
operating temperature considering solely what is best for the engine?

For me this would be the controlling factor, wanting as I do to run the
engine at maximum efficiency and provide best opportunity for extended
engine life.

Bruce Burrows

'59 MGA basket case
'60 Daimler SP 250
'61 Daimler SP 250
'73 MGB driver

My Dart website (not my cars!):

http://community-2.webtv.net/guardian45/THEDAIMLERSP250DART/


--WebTV-Mail-5336-9215
Content-Disposition: Inline

Received: from mailsorter-101-9.iap.bryant.webtv.net (209.240.198.43) by
        storefull-151.iap.bryant.webtv.net with WTV-SMTP; Fri, 21 Apr 2000
        14:00:33 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <mgs-owner@autox.team.net>
Received: from triumph.cs.utah.edu (triumph.cs.utah.edu [155.99.188.52]) by
        mailsorter-101-9.iap.bryant.webtv.net (8.8.8-wtv-f/ms.dwm.v7+dul2)
        with ESMTP id OAA18804; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 14:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by triumph.cs.utah.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1)
        with SMTP id OAA16914; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 14:34:22 -0600 (MDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by triumph.cs.utah.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id
        OAA16834 for mgs-actors; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 14:34:00 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <200004212033.NAA25363@harrier.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: (Paul) Shroud Question
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 13:36:48 -0700
x-sender: mvheim@earthlink.net
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, January 22, 1998
From: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>
To: "MG List" <mgs@autox.team.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: owner-mgs@autox.team.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>

I still don't see how fitting a cooler 'stat makes the engine run any 
cooler, if in warm weather the 'stat is wide open anyway. At this point, 
with the engine fully warmed up and operating at a stable temperature, 
say, 187 degrees, both the 165 and the 180 degree thermostats would be 
wide open, and there would be absolutely no difference between them. 
Meanwhile, a 190 degree thermostat would be cycling open and shut, 
presumably. Now if the ambient temperature were lower, so that the engine 
would reach equilibrium at, oh, 172 degrees, then you would notice an 
effective difference with the "cooler" thermostat. BUT (and this is a big 
"but"), from my experience, at this kind of ambient temperature you are 
more likely to want to run the heater at full efficiency, and are not 
concerned at all with overheating or low oil pressure. In other words, 
it's cold out, and you would prefer the high temperature thermostat at 
this time, anyway. This is why I don't believe in fitting a unreasonably 
low temperature thermostat, like 165 degrees. The engine will never 
stabilize at that low a temperature EXCEPT when it's already cold out 
(and you don't want it to).

Obviously, if you have fitted a larger radiator, larger oil cooler, or 
extra cooling fans, this may not apply to you. But then you have to 
consider whether 165 degrees is the most efficient operating temperature 
for the engine. IMO it is not.

Paul Hunt had this to say:

>The other thing, and the real reason why hotter and cooler thermostats are
>recommended for extremes of climate (well, extremes when compared to the UK)
>is that there is always some cooling via the engine surfaces.  Small engines
>in very cold weather may never get up to temperature when cruising, which is
>why people blank off the radiator in winter.  They are not really blanking
>off the radiator of course because the thermostat is closed anyway, what
>they are doing is reducing the icy blast through the engine bay and hence
>the block cooling.
>
>When an engine is run in a relatively hot climate there is relatively less
>block cooling for a given load, so more heat has to travel through the
>radiator to get cooled, and heat is retained in the engine for longer,
>raising the internal temperature of the engine above what is ideal.  A
>cooler stat helps to compensate for this reduction in block cooling.
>Indeed, at one time the cooler stat was fitted as standard in order to
>increase (or rather restore) oil pressure.  This works by reducing the
>internal temperature of the engine, so running with a cooler stat really
>does allow the engine to run cooler.  Likewise a hotter stat in cooler
>climes helps to compensate for the *increased* block cooling and resulting
>lower internal temperatures.
>
>PaulH.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Bruce Burrows <bburrows@webtv.net>
>To: <mgs@autox.team.net>
>Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2000 4:39 PM
>Subject: Re: (Paul) Shroud Question
>
>
>>
>> --WebTV-Mail-8772-525
>>
>> Your reply (which appears below) was a good one, Paul, and much
>> appreciated.  I have to say you forced my mind to work just a bit!  Here
>> is my best take:
>
>...
>
>


--

Max Heim
'66 MGB GHN3L76149
If you're near Mountain View, CA,
it's the red one with the silver bootlid.


--WebTV-Mail-5336-9215--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>