mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: con rods

To: "Carl French" <cfrench@cybertours.com>, <mgs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: con rods
From: "Harlan Jillson" <hjillson@argolink.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 22:03:54 -0600
Carl,
   Just an opinion here.   The 1950/2 liter punch out is a risk.  The stuff
I've read indicates that somewhere around 1 in 4 blocks won't take it due to
casting shifts and such.  The other problem is that the blocks become
unstable at this bore ( some of them) and there have been problems with the
rings not seating, oil consumption, etc.  This is one of those 'at your own
risk' things.
   I really don't think the addition of 5 or 6 ci is going to by you
anything significant.  Go with a 60 overbore, and at least you've got one
more step before you have to junk the block.
   As to balancing, it is JMHO that all rotating components should be
balanced during a rebuild, if they haven't been before, or if any are
replaced.  Balancing leads to smoothness and lack of vibration, which I
consider good things, if you are dealing with unknowns, as most of us are
when re-building engines this old, a minimal expenditure to have the
assembly balanced will pay off in the long run.
   Dissenters can offer their own opinions of course.
Harlan.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>