Sounds good to me, Carl E.
wizardz wrote:
> heres a better one Clavin
> ...using my e-mail address in the example
> I've actually had ISP's e-mail and apologize
> for the actions of their clients.
> (remember...in the end... they too are responisible by law)
> --------------------------------------
> This message is an automated allert.
>
> This network has been notified of the reception of an illegal e-mail message.
> to the address:
> wizardz@toad.net
>
> All unsolicited e-mailings must include a valid return address
> and the contents must contain a link to remove the addressee
> from any future mailings.
>
> Do not include this address in any future unsolicited mailings as
> this network will prosecute to the fullest extent of the law.
>
> Reference the McCain Anti-Spamming Bill passed by the Senate
> 99-0 on May 12, 1998.
>
> National Infrastructure Protection Center (NIPC) ,washington D.C.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Paul Tegler
> 1973 BGT - Daily Driver
> Rat - 1980 Spitfire w/ O/D - in re-hab
> Punkin' - 1978 Spitfire - in Superb Shape!
> email: wizardz@toad.net http://www.teglerizer.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Calvin Krug <ckrug@laf.cioe.com>
> To: mgs@autox.team.net <mgs@autox.team.net>
> Date: Thursday, September 16, 1999 12:14 PM
> Subject: Spam on the list
>
> Oops, looks like one slipped through today. Another one of those get rich
> quick pyramid schemes. I could just ignore it, but that's not my style.
> What I always do is reply to the sender, including the original message,
> with this statement attached:
> "NOTICE TO BULK E-MAILERS Pursuant to US Code, Title 47, Chapter 5,
> Subchapter II, p.227, any and all nonsolicited commercial E-mail sent
> to this address is subject to a download and archival fee in the
> amount of $500 US. Anyone who sends unsolicited commercial e-mail to
> this account will be charged a $500 proofreading fee. Consider this
> official notification. Failure to abide by this will result in legal
> action."
> In the event that they've used a fake email adress, I have a filter set up
> to discard any messages that bounce back to me. Maybe if enough of us do
> this, these people will get the point. Or their ISP will notice the volume
> and cut them off. It's worth a try.
>
> Calvin Krug
>
> "Poke me with a fork, I think I'm done"
|