--0-1649760492-930935026=:5971
Content-Disposition: inline
elimination of the front muffler may give you the sound you are looking
for BUT may give you way too much of it. In my experience, a tight,
rebuilt, high horsepower engine is not silenced enough in the low gears
with just the rear muffler.
Note: forwarded message attached.
===
Terry O'Brien, RDU/NC/USA
-'77 MG B (daily driver)
-'82 Dodge Ram 50
-'90+ various boring things
-other people's British problems
--0-1649760492-930935026=:5971
X-Apparently-To: mgrepairs@yahoo.com via mdd1102.mail.yahoo.com
Return-Path: <mgs-owner@autox.team.net>
Received: from triumph.cs.utah.edu (155.99.188.52)
by mta111.yahoomail.com with SMTP; 2 Jul 1999 09:50:47 -0700
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by triumph.cs.utah.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id KAA29707;
Fri, 2 Jul 1999 10:43:05 -0600 (MDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by triumph.cs.utah.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id KAA29666
for mgs-actors; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 10:42:51 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <377CEA38.D18E26EE@adelphia.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 12:35:04 -0400
From: Carl Elliott <grunt2@adelphia.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: H4aardvrk@aol.com
CC: cfrench@cybertours.com, mgs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Fwd: best sounding exhaust]
References: <e936724f.24ae32df@aol.com>
Sender: owner-mgs@autox.team.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Carl Elliott <grunt2@adelphia.net>
Content-Length: 451
Stoch without the foward muffler, Sounds great. Carl E.
H4aardvrk@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 7/2/99 7:40:21 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> cfrench@cybertours.com writes:
>
> << as anyone got an opinion about the nicest
> sounding system. I'm not crazy about the Ansa-look twin tail pipe, and I
> don't need to go stainless steel. I want to retain the stock manifold.
> Any ideas?
> >>
> go to the stock exhaust then.
> yours, H4(Howard)
--0-1649760492-930935026=:5971--
|