mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Back to the Intake Backfiring - #$%#$%ing car

To: MG list <mgs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Back to the Intake Backfiring - #$%#$%ing car
From: John Trindle <johnt@tsquare.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 14:34:21 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 16 Apr 1999 xyzabcde@earthlink.net wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I tried splitfires once in my '67B and the car suddenly barely ran.  The plug
> ads claim that there is more spark from more sparking area on the plug.  But
> electricity follows the path of least resistance--the spark will only jump 
>from
> one point.  So, as far as I can tell, the split in the plug just makes it
> impossible to gap the thing correctly since it's impossible to tell where the
> spark will start.
> 
> Any of you engineers out there care to correct my uninformed assumptions? ;-)
> 
> Denise Thorpe

As far as I can tell, you're right.  The only thing that might make
modified plugs spark "better" than regular old ones is that sparks jump
better to/from points then large flat surfaces.  Of course, points wear
down faster than thicker parts, causing the gap to change.  So, spark
plugs are designed as a compromise.

Having two points is only helpful if one gets fouled (with oil, say) and
the other doesn't. RX7s use unusually-tipped plugs since the oil to lube
the rotary seals is injected into the combustion chamber directly.  They
have four outer (base) electrodes and a recessed tip.

-- 
John M. Trindle | johnt@tsquare.com    | Tidewater Sports Car Club
'73 MGB DSP     | '69 Spitfire H Stock | '88 RX-7 C Stock


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>