mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: tail lights

To: MG Mailing List <mgs@Autox.Team.Net>
Subject: Re: tail lights
From: Steve Bettencourt <steveb5815@edgenet.net>
Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 08:49:11 -0500
Mike and Ray,

If the lower part of the tail light is amber is it really a good idea to
run it as a parking light (or running light) on the rear? Other than the
'69 and earlier lenses (all red) I thought they all had amber turn signals
out back.

Just a thought.

At 08:07 AM 5/13/98 EDT, miker15 wrote:
>
>On Wed, 13 May 1998 07:50:06 -0400 (EDT) RAY WYGONIK
><RWYGONIK@grove.iup.edu> writes:
>>On my 74 B the lower part of the tail lights only appear to be turn 
>>signals. 
>>they do not come on when I put the lights on. 
<<snip>>
>Bob Howard posted a message a while back about how he wired in an extra
>bulb for just this purpose. Ive seen it and its very effective- of course
>i lost it - perhaps he will repeat it!!
>
>mike robson

Steve Bettencourt
'79 MGB 
Steve's HotRod World
http://www3.edgenet.net/CruizinRI

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>