I'll second that. This list serves the purpose quite well and yowould probably
run into the same thing as the attempt to get people on IRC.
Dan
----------
From: John McEwen
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 1998 9:24 PM
To: Andy Ramm
Cc: mgs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Creation of MGs Newsgroup?
Andy, I think we've got a good thing going. If it ain't broke don't fix it.
John
>I've been thinking of proposing an MGs usenet
>group to augment the listserv we have here. This
>listserv is incredibly valuable. For me,
>mgs@autox.team.net is a daily ritual. However,
>there may be listers for whom a usenet group is
>more convenient, or those MG owners on the net
>that do not know about team.net that might also
>benefit from a newsgroup.
>
>I'd like to know what people think before
>proceeding, so please give me your feedback. If
>list members think that an MGs usenet group would
>be detrimental to the list, I absolutely won't
>begin the process.
>
>I'm hoping the cross-pollination of a listserv and
>a newsgroup would be a positive thing. If anyone
>has a historic perspective about what has been
>done in the past, I'd like to know about that too.
>
>Second, should I do a complete proposal for
>something like rec.autos.mg, or should I short
>circuit that and create an alt.mgs list? Again,
>I'll do nothing without consulting this list
>first.
>
>All comments are welcome!
>
>Cheers,
>
>Andy
>--
>
>
>
>
>Andy Ramm
>A silver face in a tweed world.
>Remove obvious spam filter from email address when
>replying.
>"What we play is the blues, straight from the
>delta, and I believe we'll make it on that," B.B.
>King
>
>
>By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B),
>Sec.227(b)(1)(C) and Sec.227(b)(3)(C), it is
>unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to
>this equipment. A violation of the aforementioned
>Section is punishable by action to recover actual
>monetary loss, or $500, whichever is greater, for
>each violation.
|