mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Rover 200 - should it be an MG?

To: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>, "The Richards" <smrm@coastalnet.com>
Subject: Re: Rover 200 - should it be an MG?
From: Phil Raby <mgworld@chp.ltd.uk>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 97 20:56:41 -0000
On 14/12/97 3:02 pm Paul Hunt said

>There may no longer be a separate MG factory (or more accurately, assembly 
>plant) 
>but there is very definitely marque and model loyalty within the Rover 
>factories. 
[SNIP]
>
>Cynicism, or rose-tinted spectacles, may well hamper the viewer from 
>appreciating 
>worthy products. 

Sorry to slag off British products, but I've just driven a Rover 800. It 
was very disappointing, dynamically. The handling, ride and general feel 
were all inferior to a BMW 5-series, and the car felt, quite frankly old 
- which it is. In fact, (not sure I should say this) it felt like some 
American saloons I've driven - wallowy and crude. Shame really, roll on 
its replacement.

Having said this, other Rover products are very good - the 200, MGF (of 
course), Discovery and Range Rover (if you're into 4WD, which I'm not) 
and - by all accounts, although I haven't driven it - the Freelander.



Philip Raby
Editor, MG World
PO Box 163, Bicester OX6 3YS, UK
Tel: 01869 340061 Fax: 01869 340063 Mobile 0467 767361
www.chp.ltd.uk


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>