mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: MGF? No, merci

To: Donald Scott <scottdon@napanet.net>
Subject: Re: MGF? No, merci
From: Tom Buchanan <buchanan@preferred.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 1997 13:13:46 -0500
At 09:32 AM 12/13/97 -0800, you wrote:
>>You should drive an MGF before you make a judgement, it is FAR superior 
>>to the Miata/MX5, which did not advance sports car technology one iota. 
>>I'm glad Rover didn't go along the retro route and just do a rehashed B. 
>>If you look back over the years, MG has always produced modern, 
>>up-to-date cars, which makes the F a true evolutionary successor to the B.
>>
>>
>>Philip Raby
>>Editor, MG World
>>PO Box 163, Bicester OX6 3YS, UK
>>Tel: 01869 340061 Fax: 01869 340063 Mobile 0467 767361
>>www.chp.ltd.uk
>>
>>
>Philip,
>
>I love MG's just like you do.  An important part of that love is the
>physical appearance of the cars.  I've owned many different MG sports cars,
>and just looking at their beautiful lines makes me smile.  I still remember
>when I saw my first new MGB in 1962.  Iris blue it was, and soooo good
>looking.  I even think Farina-bodied MG's are pretty, and I love the lines
>of all the MG sports cars, up to the rubber bumper cars.  After that, my
>love interests have gone to other places (like Japan).  To me, for the
>complete love affair, the car must arrest me with its looks.  The MGF leaves
>me cold.  Even if it drives wonderfully, it ain't enough.
>
>Don Scott 
>
Couldn't agree more!!!

Tom Buchanan
buchanan@preferred.com
http://pages.preferred.com/~buchanan/mg.html
1974 MGB-GT
Kingsport, TN

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>