mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: MG/Grammar

To: Kai Radicke <mowogmg@pil.net>
Subject: Re: MG/Grammar
From: Andy Ramm <aramm@concentric.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 15:40:39 -0800
Kai,

For you, my friend, I have gone to the oracle, the keeper of all
editorial knowlege that is good and wise, the mistress of grammar, the
high priestess of English usage.....  my sister.

She edits some lesser-known national columnists like, oh, uh, Ann
Landers, Dear Abbey, Robert Novak, Robert Fulgum, Hillary Clinton, Molly
Ivans, etc...  She was editor of the UCLA literary review as an
undergrad and graduated with honors in English Literature.

She thinks your teacher is a dope and has no business teaching English.

Andy


PS -- I own an MG and another MG and an additional MG.  

Kai Radicke wrote:
> 
> OK, I have a really stupid question...
> 
> my English teacher was having a cow (or a Triumph) about me using "an MG"
> in a sentence I wrote.  I don't think I have ever seen "a MG" in my life,
> it just sounds dumb.  My teacher does have a point, but anyone know why we
> do this?
> 
> ex:
> 
> a Morris Minor
> an MGB
> 
> now say it in a sentence:
> 
> I have a Morris Minor.
> I have an Morris Minor.
> 
> I have an MGB.
> I have a MGB.
> 
> Am I going insane?  Or do I just need a life ;-)
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Kai
> 
> Kai Radicke -- mowogmg@pil.net, 1966 MGB @ http://www.pil.net/~mowogmg
> Dialogue Internet - Intelligent Internet Solutions (Net Khan)
> 
> IRC: irc.mcs.net, #inet-access (my nick: ActiveX or KMR)

-- 




Andy Ramm
A silver face in a tweed world.
Remove obvious spam filter from email address when replying.
"What we play is the blues, straight from the delta, and I believe we'll
make it on that,"  B.B. King



I refuse to accept any unauthorized or unsolicited E-mail
communications.  The sending of an unsolicited E-mail communication
shall be proof that the sender has agreed, by action, to send $500.00
US/ certified funds to me, prior to any unsolicited or unauthorized
transmission.

"By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meets
the definition of a telephone fax machine.  By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is
unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment.  By
Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is
punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500, whichever
is greater, for each violation."

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>