To: | a-rrees@microsoft.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Short porting, Idle vs timing. |
From: | aurora-guy@juno.com (Eric Klos) |
Date: | Thu, 6 Nov 1997 15:31:36 -0500 |
>Why would polishing use more fuel, you would think that if the mixture >flowed better and you did not loose some in the "pockets" you would >have >better fuel metering and actually get better mileage. My take on it is that you could get more fuel mixture to the chamber, and not have the turbelence backing it up. Eric Klos <aurora-guy@juno.com> Harrison Twp. MI WANTED:Datsun Z car slot cars, static models, diecasts, literature, etc. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Short porting, Idle vs timing. -Reply, Bill Eastman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Short porting, Idle vs timing., Eric Klos |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Short porting, Idle vs timing. -Reply, Bill Eastman |
Next by Thread: | Re: Short porting, Idle vs timing., Eric Klos |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |