| To: | EMILY COWEN <ecowen@cln.etc.bc.ca> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: MGC & Crank Pulley: Greater Specifidity |
| From: | Rich Mason <rmason@ro.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Apr 1997 08:10:01 -0500 |
At 02:48 AM 4/10/97 -0700, you wrote: >RCH?? I always thought it was a BCH; but I guess the colour is a form >of size grading... Wanda. Hmm, shades of Monty Python, et al. I thought it was a well established fact that RCH was much finer than BCH. Maybe a survey is in order? Rich Mason '73 MGB __________________________________________ e-mail--> rmason@ro.com WWW-----> http://ro.com/~rmason MG Page-> http://ro.com/~rmason/mgpage.htm __________________________________________ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Split Fire vrs. V Grove Plugs, Two00mph |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Okay, I give up. They all suck!, Larry Dickstein |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: MGC & Crank Pulley: Greater Specifidity, EMILY COWEN |
| Next by Thread: | Re: MGC & Crank Pulley: Greater Specifidity, Todd Mullins |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |