Yo Kai,
You know something, I was just thinking to myself "what a fine, decent
young man this sounds like." I was even thinking of introducing you to
my 15 year old daughter (in a couple of years). For those who do not
know, Kai is going to be 15 week after next. But now I get this this
stuff about taking my cars, auctioning me into slavery. Worst of all
you want to someday own a Triumph? Later for you, David Deutsch
You wrote:
>
>David:
>
>I still want a TR6 or TR4A and you can't change my mind by
brainwashing me
>:-)
>
>>and 2nd because it was so ugly they could not sell them
>
>How untrue about the TR7, it was the most successful TR of all. It
sold
>like 150,000 cars in like 4 years (this says alot about Triumph cars).
The
>TR6 sold about 142,000 in 7 years.
>
>>That's the truth and given enough time I'll be happy to fabricate
>> documentation atesting to it.
>
>David, you have 48 hours and for every 12 hours after that deadline
you
>must give me one of your MGs and when you run out of cars to give me,
well
>I will start the bidding on your other assets:-) I will auction off
>everything you own until I see this documentation. And if you fail to
do
>any of the above I will auction you off to a member of the list, maybe
John
>Twist needs another employee :-)
>
>Kai "drink your Lucasaide" Radicke
>
>---------
>> From: David Deutsch <drded@ix.netcom.com>
>> To: Kai Radicke <mowogmg@dynanet.com>
>> Subject: Re: Real MGs/FORD/Triumphs the true story
>> Date: Monday, November 11, 1996 3:38 PM
>>
>> The fact is that Triumphs were alway made for the sole purpose of
>> marketing MGs. The salesmen would say "well you want a economical
>> British sports car, MG is it, or there is always that Triumph thing"
>> This is why MGB was basicly the same for 18 years while Triumphs
kept
>> getting uglier and uglier. The trick was to make them unatractive
but
>> still have people who had little or no taste in automobles buy them.
>> Well went the TR7 was introduced it was the beginning of the end,
first
>> because now they were both British Leyland produces and people who
>> bought triumphs before suddenly realized their cars were truely ugly
>> and 2nd because it was so ugly they could not sell them. Well
Triumphs
>> still are around and MG clubs welcome their presents at meets
because
>> they still are proof, by comparison, of the beauty of the MG. That's
>> the truth and given enough time I'll be happy to fabricate
>> documentation atesting to it. Safety Fast
>>
>> You wrote:
>> >
>> >No comment on this one. Allright maybe one comment:>I think FORD
>> sucks now matter what car companies it owns, BMW is a good
>> >owner for MG. FORD has taken the AM DB7 and made it look just like
>> the Jag>XK8, wait maybe they took the XK8 and made it look like the
>> DB7. Now>imagine if they owned MG and Triumph. Would you MGers
want
>> an MG that>looks like a TR, I think not.>
>> >Kai M. Radicke -
>> >1966 MGB
>
>
|