Christopher M. Delling wrote:
>
> Jason-
>
> I am sure that I am one of the few listee's that PREFER the rubber
> bumper styling, so I won't start an argument about style - but I think
> you need to get your facts straight. The ride height on the
> rubber-bumper cars was higher than stock, by approximatley 1.5". This
> increase in height can be offset by a great degree by going to a lower
> profile tire.
>
> 4"!!!! You make us sound like we run 33" monster mudder tires!
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Chris Delling
Yikes! :0
I didn't want to start a war about it, by any means. Both cars are very
attractive, but as I said, personally I like the chrome bumpered better.
Shheeesh! ;)
Anyway... I'll have to double-check my sources. I know I read somewhere
(more than one source, if I'm correct) that it was 4". I know when you
put the two side by side, it looks like a bit more than 1.5"! I can
probably tell the height difference blindfolded, just by getting in one
or the other. In all likelyhood, the change was somewhere in between...
Regards,
J
|