On Mon, 17 Apr 1995, Allen Bachelder wrote:
> Rob - I would think that due to the removal of the body contour metal below
> the tail lamps (and a different rear valance?) that a chrome bumper
> conversion would have to contain some sort of tell-tale filler material
> that would be a dead give-away. There are similar problems in front. ' Am
> curious about what the kit would contain. I have both types, and
> personally, I like each for what it is. I can't see why convert either
> type.
> Allen Bachelder
>
I took a quick look through my old mags to see if I could find
more on the conversion. It's in Classic and Sportscars, but I haven't
found the issue yet.
I really wouldn't trash a good rubber bumper car just to put
chrome on it either. I've had a 77 b and it was just dandy too. If i
can find the article i'll include the parts it lists.
Rob in Columbia
72 MGB
86 Golf (but only until tommrow, I sold it today)
86 Nissan Pickup
|