| To: | Kai Radicke <mowogmg@pil.net> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Stag Engine (was: Rover V8 prices...) | 
| From: | Paul Hunt <paul.hunt1@virgin.net> | 
| Date: | Mon, 23 Nov 1998 20:16:57 +0000 | 
| Cc: | Robbie Anderson <Robbie@rie.net.au>, MGB-V8 List <mgb-v8@Autox.Team.Net> | 
| Organization: | I.T. Answers Ltd | 
| References: | <001701be1616$c7e7c760$a6a508cf@kairadic> | 
| Reply-to: | Paul Hunt <paul.hunt1@virgin.net> | 
| Sender: | owner-mgb-v8@Autox.Team.Net | 
This was a common conversion, in the UK at least, due to the problems with the Stag engine. The conversion usually necessitated bonnet louvres. PaulH. Kai Radicke wrote: > > >I know it sounds like nit-picking but a stag V8 is actually closer to two > >triumph four cylinder blocks, joined at the waist at birth. It is not a > rover V8. > > You're correct, as someone mentioned to me earlier. I was recalling a > particular Stag, that I see at the local LBC shop often, which does have a > RoverV8 and just made the assumption (without looking into it) that this was > correct.  | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Engine wts and fast Fords, DANMAS | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | New seats for the "B"- from a Miata Purists please delete immediately!, Jim Stuart | 
| Previous by Thread: | Stag Engine (was: Rover V8 prices...), Kai Radicke | 
| Next by Thread: | RE: Rover 8 vs. ?, KILE, PAUL D | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |