Terry,
My point is that for any of our clubs to sustain themselves, they need
to be inclusive, not exclusive. Our local club is a chapter of NAMGBR
and NAMGAR. Other local clubs that are NEMGTR local chapters have the
same number of Ts as we do, but they are a larger percentage of the
total. If you are reaching 25 people with Ts, why does it matter if
they are 25 standing alone or part of a larger entity.
Charlie
TATERRY@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 6/10/2004 7:43:40 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> ewsinc@suscom.net writes:
>
>
>> The closest other local chapters are 2
>> hours away. Hank determined that we didn't have a high enough
>> percentage of T types in the club to be considered. It seems that they
>> don't care about the future of the T Register, or they would be taking
>> such opportunities to spread the influence of the club.
>
>
>
> Charlie, I belong to the NEMGTR and I'm 3000 miles away. I also
> belong to two local MG clubs. The "they" you are talking about are
> volunteers and folks will real other jobs and
> responsibilities.....they all have their warts too, just like you and
> me. I would not consider a MG club with 200 members and only 25 T
> types a T club either.
> If you want to change things, get involved and help the change.....
> Terry Sanders
> Oakland, CA
> Newsletter for Life of the Sorry Safari Touring society!
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/mg-t
|