I think the answer to this whole flap is that if there is a better
system
out there that:
1- Is affordable
2- is as accurate
3- Is reliable for not missing ANY times
Everyone would use it, USFRA, SCTA/BNI and Rice Bros.
When you have invested as much time in searching and testing as
Gary Wilkinson has ... you'll know why we use what we have now.
Wes
On Sep 3, 2009, at 7:44 AM, Jon Wennerberg wrote:
> On Sep 2, 2009, at 10:14 PM, dan warner wrote:
>
>> So, what does everyone who is dissatisfied with current timing
>> system propose to do with previous records? Toss 'em because the
>> older methods were not as accurate as the current or future methods?
>>
>>
>> DW
>
>
> Dan --
>
> I hope you're not including me in the group of folks "...dissatisfied
> with current timing system...". There is absolutely no way that I
> have ever either stated - or even implied any dissatisfaction with the
> current system.
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
Land-speed mailing list
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed
|