To: | FastmetalBDF@aol.com, ddahlgren@snet.net, Sparky.2211@cox.net, |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Another - thought on Engine Setbacks |
From: | James Tone <gmc6power@earthlink.net> |
Date: | Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:55:11 -0800 (GMT-08:00) |
All who replyed got it. I just didn't want the guy with a smallblock v-8 to put in a v-6 and end up with a setback improper for the class and get denied a record cause they didn't think about it. I believe we have have a Studebaker in Gas coupe running in gas coupe with this problem right now. but I've not inspected it so I am not sure . . . . . J.D. This >would render the car illegal if the V8 was already set back the maximum >amount >allowable under the class rules ..... the shorter block length would be the >guilty culprit here, |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: Another, Tom Bryant |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 292 Chevy Exhaust Manifold, Tom Neimeyer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Another - thought on Engine Setbacks, FastmetalBDF |
Next by Thread: | the TEST: Thanks everyone who wrote; it's workin! -ok to, Doug Anderson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |