schiet, I donno Bobby ! I ain't no expert !
Hell I'm just a 'bus driver'. -you know,... like Ralph Cramden ;- )
I'd hafta guess though, that something that could breath as good as thet
puppydawg ought to be able to be tuned to make beaucoup use-able horsepower
-you think ?
cheers, -it's your ol' pal, "Dirt Track Doug"
forever leadin' the way in the eternal search for Hot Blues,
Cold Beer, Fast Cars and Warm Willin' Wimin'...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Bobbyhotrods@comcast.net
To: "Doug Anderson" <boogiewoogie12@hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: destroke 302
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 01:52:10 +0000
Dougie, what about bore to stroke ratio? Where do we want it with a N.A. LSR
motor. I can guess but what do you say? BJ
From: "Doug Anderson" <boogiewoogie12@hotmail.com>
> Hi Phil how you ? Bigger bores allow bigger valves. ...hmmmmm
>
> 'your way' sounds nice to me. -oughtta be good for over 12,000 rpm
>
> whoooomBah!
>
>
>
> and cheers, -it's your ol' pal, "Dirt Track Doug"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> From: "Phillip Landry"
> To: land-speed@autox.team.net
> Subject: destroke 302
> Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007
>
> what are the advantages (and possibilities) of destroking a 302 ford to
make
> a 260? as compared to using the 255 block to begin with. I understand the
> 255 bore is pretty small 3.68, but has the same stroke. Just theory wise
> wouldn't it be better to have the 4.0 bore of the 302 and whatever short
> stroke is required to reach 260? Obviously I'm thinking of a "E" class
> motor, 260 max. I also understand a stock 260 is actually a little over
the
> limit.
>
> Phil
_________________________________________________________________
Dave vs. Carl: The Insignificant Championship Series. Who will win?
http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwsp0070000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://davevscarl.spaces.live.com/?icid=T001MSN38C07001
|