In a message dated 11/14/2006 11:49:15 A.M. Mountain Standard Time,
saltrat@lubricationdynamics.com writes:
Actually, your idea is not bad Otto. It uses existing space and
offers a solution to the "turn-out" issue. At least someone is
looking at the "line" problem with something other than a "too
hard to do" attitude. If we add anything, we will have to also
add equipment and staff. So throw that into the mix and a solution
might just result. Keep thinking......everybody!
Skip
Thanks Skip!
But be careful, agreeing with me might get you black balled too! LOL
The plan could work and be as safe as we do it now. Details need to be
worked out and some timing equipment would require acquisition but it's all
achievable. Just takes some open thinking minds like yours to look at it in a
positive way and make it happen.
People can throw stones and bring in a ton of "what if's" but those "what
if's" apply to what we do now.
2 short or 2 long courses wouldn't work next to each other but a short and
long side by side could work quite well. But alas, it will never happen.
Thanks again Skip!
Otto
|