To: | Glen A Barrett <speedtimer@charter.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Fast Lane |
From: | Doug Odom <dlodom@charter.net> |
Date: | Fri, 13 Oct 2006 18:15:00 -0700 |
Glen, I see your point, but a car going 180mph takes 60 seconds to go 3 miles. A car going 240mph takes 45 seconds. Difference of only 15 seconds. The car going 180mph should be able to slow down and get off the course faster than the one going 240mph also. Messing around at the starting line wastes a lot more time than that. Doug Odom in big ditch Glen Barrett wrote: > Another problem we have is vehicles that qualify at 175 on the short > course come over to the long course and can't run much over that speed > but they are allowed to run all 5 miles at a speed of maybe 180 mph. > That takes up time as well. I see a lot of it. I just time them. > Glen > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Tone" <gmc6power@earthlink.net> > To: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; "Skip Higginbotham" > <Saltrat@lubricationdynamics.com>; "Tom Bryant" > <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; "Sparky" <wmtsmith@landracing.com>; > <land-speed@autox.team.net> > Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 3:33 PM > Subject: Re: Fast Lane > > >> You can not make a person now running who is trying to break a record >> which used 5 miles to do it a shorter course..If that's what you are >> suggesting.. >> Many records set over 175 could not be reached on a shorter course >> especially ones over 200. This has been discussed many times at Board >> meetings. >> A 3rd course for over 225 is fine; but anyone qualifying at 175 in >> the 1/4 must continue to be allowed to go five miles. I my opinion >> that extra course would spend most its time empty after the first 2 days >> >>> Subject: Re: Fast Lane >>> >>> Guys... are we thinking in the wrong direction? Could we focus our >>> thoughts >>> on Slower vehicles and the Second course, or set of courses with >>> the Pit's >>> in the middle? >>> >>> Think of it as the same thing we have now... Plus another timing >>> tower set >>> up for a slower course.... >>> >>> Then the standard would be.... >>> >>> 1. Over 125 you move to the second course ( 1 mile course ) >>> 2. Over 175 allows you to move to the Long courses ( 2 mile course ) >>> >>> Then you go to our current system with cars set up to run on the two >>> long >>> courses both 5 miles... to qualify for the longest course you have >>> to run >>> over say.... 225 at the 1/4 >>> >>> I'm with Tom... there wouldn't be a position that would allow me to >>> favor >>> anyone who's car goes to the front because it's faster.... The riot >>> would >>> be justified... |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Speedweek Race Improvement Ideas, Skip Higginbotham |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Fast Lane, Flowbench |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Fast Lane, Glen Barrett |
Next by Thread: | Re: Fast Lane, Flowbench |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |