Dan, and others--
Your comment highlights my main point. I and a lot of others don't know. We
go to the rule book and don't find clear answers to obvious questions.
I'm not a big fan of expanding the rule book with a bunch of rules to cover
every possible situation. I much prefer the common sense way things are done
now. But sometimes we need a little "due process".
There's a neat rule at the beginning of section 3.B about requesting
deviations to roll structures 45 days prior to the event. I'd suggest
something like that with regard to licensing deviation requests. I think most
requests could be initially answered with a form letter or a reference to a
page on the SCTA/BNI website.
Yes, this would add to the administrative workload for some of you guys. But
driver licensing is a lot more important issue than the tilt of a grill shell
on a street roadster (Thanks for your help on that one , Dan).
Ed Weldon
----- Original Message -----
From: dan warner
To: Ed Weldon ; land-speed@autox.team.net
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 6:17 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Carr runs big numbers?
How do you know that accomendations are not now being made?
DW
Ed Weldon <23.weldon@comcast.net> wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ed Weldon" <23.weldon@comcast.net>
To: "jkamo" ; "James Tone" ;
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 6:05 PM
> But I do think when a driver with substantial experience and demonstrated
> capabilities comes to drive at of our meets it seems silly to expect him
or
> her to go through the entire "one size fits all" process. And I question
> whether this process alone would sort out the driver who for one reason
or
> another is really not suited to make a high speed run at any given meet.
> Ed Weldon
|