Stephen,
I have heard that some are running 10w/30 and I have no quarrel with
that. I have even thought of running it myself. It would be interesting
to hear what weights others are running. I guess one question that I
have would be...other than the power to run the oil pump, what is lost
running heavier oil with a dry sump system?
All that said, being one that has had my share of blown motors, I am
reluctant to change what is working for me.
Tom
Stephen F. Doherty wrote:
> If I may branch off and address viscosity:
>
> One of the comments that is commonly made about Rollie Free
> is that he ran a very low viscosity oil, like 10 wt (or
> maybe less?), and one also hears about racers pre-heating
> the oil, to avoid running the engine for a time to get
> the oil up to temp. I also suspect Rollie wasn't concerned
> about getting hundreds of flat out miles from the engine,
> just enough miles for that year's meet.
>
> This raises a few questions.
>
> How significant of a power loss difference is there between
> running lighter or heavier weight oil?
> The Vincent, having roller bearings on the crank and relying
> on oil flow, not pressure, is this a more favorable environment
> to run a lighter oil, ie can a plain bearing motor cope with
> such a light wt oil?
>
> What weight oil would you say (guess?) is the 'norm' for land
> speed racers, either overall or separating out bikes from cars?
>
> For whatever reason, I had this perception that all, or most,
> land speed racers were running as light a weight oil they could,
> and this comment of running 50 wt stood out.
>
> SFD
|